Will we learn from this experience?
FS-UNEP Centre / 26 March 2020
  • Share

  • 6647

  • 0

  • Print
Project Manager FS-UNEP Centre
Maria has professional experience in sustainable energy financing and consulting. She has led and executed over 50 financial advisory projects focused on renewable energy investments. Key expertise in project finance, financial analysis, project development process, project valuation.

To Author's Page

More Blog Posts
Beyond adaptation: Addressing loss and damage in the face of climate change
The barriers and drivers for the ramp-up of Power-to-X in non-OECD Countries
The future you want is out there and it's called public transport

For some weeks now, many of us have been working from home. Suddenly, our meetings have been replaced by video calls, there is no need to commute and our flights were all cancelled. Highways are empty and streets are almost deserted.

Amid the scary information shared by the media on coronavirus statistics and its impact on human lives, some voices believe that there is a global “positive side effect” of the health crisis: less pollution, cleaner water and clearer sky. Air pollution causes about 4 million premature deaths every year, according to the World Health Organization.

 Spectacular reductions in air pollution

  •  In China, satellite images published by NASA and the European Space Agency show a drastic reduction in nitrogen dioxide emissions (NO2), which is primarily produced by traffic and factories (10 to 30% lower than what is normally observed for this time of the year). In February, the average number of days without air pollution increased by 21.5% compared to the same period in the previous year, according to the Chinese Ministry of Ecology and Environment
  • Similarly, data from North Italy, one of Western Europe’s pollution centers, also shows a drastic improvement in air quality: a 40% reduction in NO2 levels (data from the Sentinel 5P satellite).
  • In Madrid and Barcelona, air pollution also reduced significantly, by up to 35% and 50% after the first three days of lock down, respectively.
  • In New York, traffic levels are estimated to be down 35% compared with a year ago, emissions of carbon monoxide have fallen by around 50%, and there was a 5-10% drop in CO2 emissions.

Coronavirus and the climate change

The risk of infectious diseases spreading was already identified as a relatively unlikely event but one with a high potential negative impact (WEF, Global Risk Report). In comparison, climate change is regarded as the single greatest threat: the most likely and damaging risk globally. As is the case of coronavirus, climate change will affect us all, albeit to a greater extent those in countries with weak health infrastructure; climate change will be especially damaging for vulnerable people, and children, who will be exposed longer to the health consequences (WHO). In fact, climate change is already impacting the health of millions of people, as it affects the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, etc. Nearly 30 million people are pushed into poverty each year as a result of natural disasters (IPCC, 2018). The impacts of climate change are geographically varied, unpredictable and exponential, and are projected to worsen depending on the efficacy of climate action (IPCC, 2018).

To address this challenge, in 2015 many countries adopted the Paris Agreement, a global climate change agreement. We have roughly a decade left to make massive cuts to global emissions and, in doing so, reduce the number of people exposed to climate-related risk and poverty by up to several hundred million by 2050 (IPCC, 2018). The rapidly needed transition requires collective actions and political leadership to improve energy efficiency, increase the use of renewable energy technologies, and phase out coal, as well as mobilizing and providing increased finance, supporting policy reforms, and building capacity (OECD, 2019).

In the past weeks, we were able to radically change our way of life as a result of coronavirus. We have proven that quick, global, behavioral change is possible. For many years now, we have seen that governments and society as a whole fail to act as needed to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Undoubtedly, many of us have taken time to reflect on this and wonder whether we can extract some useful lessons for the future. Is it necessary to wait until we are severely impacted by climate change to react?

Once this outbreak ends, will life get back to normal? Studies suggest that climate change also exacerbates the incidence of infectious diseases (WEF). By 2080, extreme global warming could expose billions of people to mosquito borne diseases in previously unaffected regions such as Europe and East Africa (WHO).

May this experience teach us that we should take climate change seriously as well.