Why Innovators Need an Entry-Timing Strategy
Management / 11 August, 2015
  • Share

  • 816

  • 0

  • Print
Professor of Strategy
Ronald Klingebiel is Professor of Strategy at the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management. He researches decision-making problems under uncertainty, particularly as regards resource allocation in innovation and strategy. You will find Ronald’s writing on technology strategy at HBR, Forbes, and The Conversation. He has also featured on the BBC, Guardian, Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Bloomberg, Le Monde, El Pais, Handelsblatt, and other media outlets.

To Author's Page

More Blog Posts
Banks must become technology companies
Dieser Weg wird kein leichter sein: Der Umbau zur Zukunftsbank
The evolution of management control systems in start ups

Sorry, this entry is only available in German.

Firms can choose between becoming a pioneer or follower. Each choice has advantages and disadvantages. Pioneers occassionally reap blockbuster returns at the cost of frequent failure. Followers face lower risks but need to share the spoils. So it is not surprising that the two types of firms need to manage their innovation portfolios very differently.

Find out what kind of entry-timing strategy works, in my recent blog post at Harvard Business Review.

For more detail about the research, check the Strategic Management Journal.